roriekelly.com: blog

Posts Tagged ‘feminism’

Stuff you should read.

Sunday, April 27th, 2008

Men Who Explain Things

Excellent op-ed in the LA times about gender, authority, and confidence.

A week or so ago, my boyfriend/bandmate/best friend and I went to meet with a guy who will be recording his album.   For the record, a very nice guy who obviously knows sound and is going to do a great job.

Andrew’s band consists of him (obviously), me (bass/vocals), our friend ChAka on keys, and this awesome girl named Courtney who plays the drums.   The biggest thing we were discussing that day was drums, so Andrew said a lot of sentences like this: “My drummer Courtney __________”, “She will probably want to record with the bass player there,” “I’m not sure if she has ever played on an electric drum kit…”

Our recording friend couldn’t get it through his head that Courtney was a female.  Andrew continuously referred to her with a litany of female pronouns,  and the guy would throw the same sentences and ideas right back at Andrew as if he had never said “she” and they were both talking about a guy.  “Your drummer, does he play with ___?” “He’ll want to ____” etc.

Kind of harmless and amusing, and again, the guy seems like a real good guy.  It was a funny story for Courtney the next time we had practice.

Still, this shows two things:
1.  Certain men have a complete inability  to conceive of females in  what they view as  Male roles, to the point where they actually are unable to process information that is repeatedly given to them.

2.  Certain men are so sure of themselves that they will doggedly pursue their own line of thought even when it’s painfully clear to everyone else in the room that they don’t have all the facts.

I think this is totally a gendered thing.  I think men are brought up to act confident whether or not they’re actually sure of themselves, and women are brought up to be willing to hear others’ points of view, even when we already know we’re right.  I further think that it’s so ingrained in male culture that they’re not even really aware it’s happening (someone needs to write The Masculine Mystique, like whoa).

The lady who wrote the op-ed discusses this all in a much more eloquent fashion than I have here.  Read it.

Let’s talk about…

Wednesday, February 6th, 2008

Yesterday I had a kind of “down” night and the most productive things I could bring myself to do were take my delicious chocolate-flavored calcium supplements, eat some pasta, drink some Mike’s Hard Berry, and surf. I think I might have even filled out a myspace survey.

Most intriguing web-destinations have been www.feministing.com, www.realmsofdespair.com, and assorted Wikipedia articles relating to the history of sexuality.

Something you may or may not know about me: I’m really interested in sex. I’m sure a few snarky remarks are forming in your cute lil heads as you’re reading, but let’s all raise our general consciousness for thirty seconds (really, you can go back) and take on sex as a serious subject.

I think sexuality is one of the rawest, most psychologically revealing parts of a person’s personality. I firmly believe that nice people who believe in equality are better in bed than apathetic people who stand by their lameass status quo. And I am as opinionated, if not more so, about sex as I am about everything else.

Some miscellaneous opinions:

  • Sex is great! I think it’s really sad that a lot of people are just dying to put a damper on the sexuality of each new incoming generation. I strongly believe in safe sex and in accurate sex education, and I really don’t think that that has to be a negative experience. I think a lot of people want to put together sex ed curriculums for teenagers that are like “Here’s the story on sex: if you have it, you’re probably not ready for it and you’ll probably get yourself or your partner totally pregnant and get AIDS and give it to your kids and be poor and sad forever. There are a few products out there to make sex safer (which we may or may not even discuss depending on what state we’re in) but you’re much better off just NOT HAVING IT ever (oh, but chill out once you’re married, the risk magically disappears)! Have a nice day, please write a paper on the symptoms of syphilus.”

    I really think it’s possible to get on an eye-to-eye level with teens and talk honestly with them about the dangers of sex and the fact that it can be beautiful and fulfilling and is nothing to be ashamed of. I think we need a really, really big national campaign combatting shame in adolescents. It’s just not fair. The message that we’re throwing at the youth of America seems to be “you’re going to get all these crazy hormones telling you to do CRAZY things! it’s hell! Don’t give in, if you do you’ll be extra sorry kthxbye.” Can we possibly revise that message?

  • Let’s get real about access to family planning and sexual health services. I think it’s really scary and creepy that many states have laws requiring parental notification and/or permission before a young woman can get things like: a gynecological examination, a pregnancy test, an STD test, hormonal birth control, an abortion. This, like abstinence-only sex programs, guarantees that young women who have sex are going to do so armed with less information and less safety.
  • Speaking of gender: How about the fact that young men are bombarded with the message that their hormones are running wild and they will naturally want to have sex with anything that moves, and that that’s totally normal, and that young women are (still in 2008?!) bombarded with the message that if they are openly interested in sex, or even dressed a certain way, they’re sluts and hoes? This is really doing a huge disservice to both genders, giving young men a false idea that they can’t control themselves and are ruled by base urges, and giving young women a false idea that there’s something wrong with them if they are interested in sex.
  • Speaking of gender part II: I find it pretty astonishing that most sexually acticve women are aware of, and open to, a variety of sexual experiences that lead to pleasure for their male partners–but that many sexually active men AND WOMEN remain somewhat ignorant of the female anatomy, how it works and how to make it feel pleasure. Even amongst those who are not ignorant of it at all, there is this issue of being uncomfortable around sex acts that center mainly around female pleasure and not so, or not as much, with ones that center mainly around male pleasure. That’s lame. Sexual education should include an accurate understanding of how arousal and orgasm occur in both the male and the female, in my opinion.
  • By the way, the last paragraph focused mainly on heterosexual sex and that’s lame, and is a microchasm of the huge huge huge amounts of lameness that assault young people of alternate sexualities. There is so little effort to be even the least little bit inclusive in education and just the general media–I do not know a single LGBT individual (myself included) who did not go through puberty with a despairing feeling that something was wrong with them. That sucks.
  • Oh, and masturbation. The much funner (and equally safe) alternative to abstinence. Please please can we stop making people be afraid of their own bodies?
  • What are some of your-all’s thoughts about sex and sexuality?

    Rape = Rape.

    Saturday, February 2nd, 2008

    The great majority of the time, I consider myself really lucky to be in a part of the world where I don’t usually have to fear for my safety just because I’m a woman.

    Tonight, I read something that made me scared, and my location did not make me feel any better.

    Here’s why: I don’t want to go to a party and get raped because I’m accidentally “dressed like pure sex.”

    I don’t want to get raped because I’m drinking and some man interprets the very fact that I’m inebriated as an invitation.

    I don’t want the word “no” to cease to mean anything because I’ve been drinking or because of what I’m wearing.

    If you agree with me, please leave your thoughts at this magazine article, and also on as many other public forums as you have the time to get to.

    Thanks.

    P.S. I don’t know any of these mythological women who “drunkenly change their mind at the last minute.” I have never in my life invited someone to have sex with me repeatedly, and then changed my mind at the very last possible moment. Nor do I know any woman who ever has. Drunk or sober.

    I do, on the other hand, know too many women who have been raped.

    Beauty & Psychology

    Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

    A friend made a post on her blog about physical attraction and her relationship to it.

    I think she has a little inner war going on about external attraction versus inner value. If she is attracted to someone for external attributes, does that make her shallow? Et cetera.

    My 2 cents, which I get to make as lengthy as I want because this is MY blog, are in short, no, it doesn’t.

    In long, I think “the external” is too broad a topic. I see two major categories that deserve distinct attention.

    1. External beauty that is inborn and lucky trait. The kind that makes me go see every movie with Johnny Depp in it, regardless of whether I think the movie will be good or horrible. The kind that manifests in both of the lovers I’ve had in my life, causing me to go, “zuh? why am I the lucky schmoe who gets hooked up like this?” External beauty of this nature doesn’t say a whole lot about the possessor of it, but hey–I don’t know many who are immune to it.

    2. The sort of external beauty that reflects a choice.

    Your body (I feel) is one of the most readily available tools of expression that you have. I feel it only makes sense to be attracted to (or unattracted to) the choices that people make with their bodies, and the thing that I like about this is that it’s based in something other than chance. It’s a real reflection of who a person is.

    I’m generally attracted to people who do anything off the beaten path with their body-canvas. I’m further attracted to people who bash existing stereotypes and roles with their choices, because I hate stereotypes and roles, and it lets me know that I could definitely like that person. I think it’s really hot that my boyfriend has long hair and sometime’s wears women’s clothing.* Actually, one of the chief things that attracts me to a person is how out-of-line they are with gender norms. It’s just how it is. Gender sucks. You bash gender, you’re in with me. The interesting thing is that I’ve always felt this way, but only in the past year or two have I really explored my feelings on feminism and gender–leading me only recently to my “gender sucks” conclusion.

    ~

    I was always a feminist, because I was lucky enough to have a mom who was a feminist, and because of a general pervading feeling of “duh? of course women should have the same rights as men?” I went through a few stages in the relationship between my self-image and my feminism. When all my friends were getting excited about shaving their legs and buying lipstick for the first time, I didn’t think beauty should matter to me at all, and didn’t shave anything or wear any makeup.

    I don’t remember when I started shaving and wearing a little bit of makeup, or why. I guess the collective excitement got to me. That, and the fact that I was still reading teen magazines. Why did I ever read those?

    My relationship with makeup ran its course from disdain to grudging desire to be attractive to the mere desire to differentiate myself with things like lots of black eyeliner. I don’t feel that the desire to differentiate oneself is childish or antifeminist. I don’t see how I could possibly not feel the desire to differentiate myself. I also acknowledge that I am differentiating myself just as much on the (considerably more frequent) days that I wear no makeup at all, and I enjoy those days as much as the black eyeliner days.

    I stopped shaving under my arms about a year ago and initially planned it as an indefinite experiment. I knew that I generally found it attractive when other women did not shave, and that therefore it was quite possible that the only reason I was shaving was because I was afraid of what people would think or something. I decided therefore, to stop for as long as it took to make a decision that would really be my decision. When I became equally comfortable walking around hairily in a tank top, then I would be ready to say “I shave/don’t shave simply because I like it this way.”

    And I found out (this is the ending of the story that is obvious to everyone but the person going through it, I guess) that I really do like not shaving better. It’s more comfortable, but I also just really like it. It would be a betrayal of me as a person–not as a woman or as a feminist or as an anything else, just as me**– to start shaving again. So I haven’t. And that makes me like me, externally and internally.

    *I tried my hardest not to get into a feminist dissection of this phrase, but I just couldn’t help it. My boyfriend does not, in all fairness, wear women’s clothing: he wears clothes which were manufactured for women, but which belong to him. He is a man, and since the clothes do belong to him, in the barest of truth I have to conclude that he is wearing a man’s clothing. But y’all know what I mean.

    **Which also comes back to feminism, because a large part of my feminism is the belief that a woman should be free to make choices as herself first–before she makes decisions as a mom, as a woman, as a feminist, as a wife, as a sister, as an anything else. That’s part of the freedom that women have been denied: to consider ourselves.